Digital Diggin

[j-one]

by converting the mp3 into wave there been added frequencies by an algorithm from the existing frequencies.

If this were true then you'd probably be seeing mp3 software players that use these algorithms as they play, so that the filesize remains the same but the quality is like the original wav.

I'm agreeing with Lazy on this, you can't regain data that's been eliminated.

 

[open mind]

one thing i thought is clear for all here U CANT GET THE ORIGINAL QUALY BACK but an converted MP3 into WAVE is BETTER qualy then MP3 THIS MUST BE CLEAR FOR ALL.

THATS MY POINT AND IF U DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN THEN **** ***.
i dont care anymore.haha
:vampire:

 

[Sanova]

nah nah. but see, ur still wrong. its the same song. i'm willin to believe that air was magically added, than some phantom quality.

 

[trebeatz]

yeah man, there is no way a simple converting software can actually rebuild ANY bit of the original song file that has been stripped away during the initial MP3 conversion

 

[Rhythmikal]

beware when timestretching MP3 files. i heard it aint the same as a wav file.

 

[TheDeen]

True, it ain't. I did it once to show a friend that mp3 = shit.

 

[Sanova]

beware when timestretching MP3 files. i heard it aint the same as a wav file.

well.. if ur time stretching mp3s... ur just lazy

 

[open mind]

looks like some cats starting to understand that wave IS better then mp3.
some learn fast some learn slow or never.

BiG LOL.

 

[Sanova]

............... no one denied that wav is 'better' than mp3...

we said u cant give it some extra quality by converting..

jeez.. some learn fast.. some learn slow...or never.

 

[open mind]

Lmfao

 

[LonChainy]

damn this thread took a big turn...from "digital digging" to "mp3 to wav conversion" WTF!!

 

[open mind]

damn this thread took a big turn...from "digital digging" to "mp3 to wav conversion" WTF!!

time to close this shit.haha