since there is so much diverse information concerning that date there is going to be tooonnnnnss of b.s. stories, beliefs, false prophets, cult crap, blahblahblah.. so i do not adopt anything like this as the truth. It is wise to continue to be good and show love to your fellow humans and guide those who reach for help. people believe in things too easily while forgeting the bigger picture of NOW. though anything is possible and the truest of unknown reality is most likely far more abstract than anyone can imagine
Well said. My turn.....
This is my type of time right here. A cosmological conversation. I just peeped the vids and he's tryin' to sell some shit I just ain't buyin'. The video was put together well (from the point of entertainment), but come on. Allow me to bust slugs and show the white meat on this bad boy;
This video demonstrates the power of packaging disinformation, which is done on a daily basis here and around the world.
I heard of this theory back in 2003. The theory's staunches supporter was a WACKY scientist by the name of Zecharia Sitchin. This guy is a scientist that believes in the existence of multiple gods (as if belief in just one is any more rational), believes in the existence of a technologically advanced human-like extraterrestrial race (called the Anunnaki in Sumerian myth) who were called the Nephilim in the Bible. As the "story" goes, they arrived on Earth probably 450,000 years ago, looking for minerals, especially gold, which they found and mined in Africa. Sitchin also believes that we were genetically engineered as slave creatures to work their gold mines by crossing extraterrestrial genes with those of the Homo erectus. Do I need to go any further? Sitchin is an author, a storyteller, who sells books for a living. Sitchin has been able to make some money off of this theory through the sale of books, speaking engagements, ect. but the doof that is currently pushing this video to sell his book is named Marshall Masters. He's tryed to hype the issue in order to sell his 2012 "survival guide" books. Dude got seminars, workshops and all kinds of shit about how to survive in 2012.
Need more proof...I always do:
In astronomy, it was thought by some that Planet X is a large hypothetical planet beyond Neptune. It was postulated to explain apparent discrepancies in the orbits of the gas giants, especially those of Uranus and Neptune. Those discrepancies have largely been resolved by measurements in the 1980s and further embellished upon in the 1990's. Today no significant portion of the scientific community believes Planet X exists.
This is why I love science. It is based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence that are then subjected to specific principles of reasoning. Many ideas in science begin as theories and over time, through research and testing they are either proven or disproven. This is done by applying a scientific method which consists of the collecting data through observation and experimentation (from sources studying the same idea from all over the world), that's in addition to the formulation and testing of hypotheses. For those that argue science isn't 100% accurate, I say to you read the previous sentences, science becomes accurute generally by that method and what's "agreed-upon" is the seemingly obvious from well-documented observation.
The narrator with his calm attempt (to lullaby your ass into a hypnotic submission), makes a number of inaccurate, unverifiable and theoritical statements. Once I saw the words "historical proof" it startin' to smell (conspriracy theorist) shitty. By his own admission the "historical proof" was referencing biblical accounts from "prophets, ancient text and folklore". It may be understood and interpreted as fact in theological history (the relationship between God and believers) but how one chooses to view things and what one chooses to believe barring any rational, empirical, or measurable evidence does not make it "historical fact". There is a name for that, it's called faith. Faith is an emotional belief in something that requires no evidence from it's believers. Biblical stories are what is referred to as "narrative history". Narrative history is a running chronology of events, purporting to be factual but always very highly selective. Also of note, rarely has a narrative story been corraborated by any of the contemporary historians or "manuscripts" of that era. I could break it down but, we can't discuss these type of topics, and I completely understand and agree. People are emotional and passionate about their beliefs. So....no historical proof.
Contrary to what's stated in the documentary, the topic didn't mysteriously disappear from the headlines. Other than these theories, scientist couldn't make it fit. Though they had found other methods that led them to be more skeptical of the theory, scientist didn't get definitive proof until 1993 when Dr. Miles Standish used data from Voyager 2's 1989 fly-by of Neptune. The planet's total mass measured lower by 0.5 percent, which changes it's gravitational effect on Uranus. Once the newly determined mass was used in the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Developmental Ephemeris (JPL DE), the supposed discrepancies in its orbit vanished. Also, to date there are no discrepancies in the trajectories of any space probes (Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Voyager 1 and Voyager 2) that can be attributed to the gravitational pull of a large undiscovered object in the outer solar system.
IRAS has 3 asteroids (it discovered) to it's credit. Phaethon October 11, 1983, 3728 IRAS August 23, 1983 and (10714) 1983 QG August 31, 1983. It's very difficult to conceal ideas and or discoveries within the scientific communities. These men and women are in pursuit of truths and proving them, making discoveries and going down in the annals of human historic achievement.
Homeboy needs to step his game up when it comes to a basic understanding of the cosmos. If your gonna use a term atleast know something about it. A brown dwarf is not an unborn star. Unborn stars are formed within molecular clouds in the interstellar medium. Brown stars are what used to be called "failed stars" because their mass is less than about 0.08 solar mass, and normal hydrogen thermonuclear fusion reactions "fail" to ignite in the core. It cools off by radiating away its internal thermal energy. That's the reason the ones that can be detected are a dim brown hue.
I won't even go any further, I could pick this thing apart all day for kicks. Ladies and gentlemen surviving 2012 and Planet X theory has been official terminated. Three shots to the head. EZ now.
